 |  |  |
| 0:00 | -1:13:46 |
David and Sarah discuss 'unmasking' and Michael Flynn, Supreme Court oral arguments over the president's financial records and "faithless electors," and Wisconsin administrative law.
Show Notes:
-The Flynn case isn’t over until the judge says it’s over
-Transcript of Michael Flynn sentencing proceedings
-Trump v. Vance oral argument transcript
-Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP oral argument transcript
-Colorado Dept. of State v. Baca oral argument transcript
-Chiafalo v. Washington oral argument transcript
-Wisconsin Supreme Court blocks statewide lockdown
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
It's ironic that Republicans are angry about both masking and unmasking.
I wasn't going to comment, but the Sarah said she wanted mail so here it is: David is obviously right. Not only are the States separate sovereign entities, but the Founders knew how to protect an office from legal interference. Article I, Section 6 protects Congress members from most crimes while in session or going to and from a Congressional session. They could have done the same with the President, but they did not. There seems to be no good Constitution reason for the assumption that the President is protected from arrest.