Showing a Little Ankle
| David French and Sarah Isgur | Apr 20 | 9 | 36 |
 |  |  |
| 0:00 | -1:13:39 |
David and Sarah discuss the Supreme Court's decision in Ramos v. Louisiana that held that the Constitution requires unanimous jury verdicts for convictions in criminal cases, a federal court's decision that upheld Michigan's independent redistricting commissions, and David responds to comments on his Sunday newsletter.
| 9 | 36 |
If French had made the argument he did on the podcast instead of the one he made in his written piece, he would not have sparked anything like the same level of outrage.
Sign up to like comment
Oof. I like Sarah, and maybe she’s playing Devil’s advocate for the sake of interesting argument—but if an article is addressing well-established Christian standards for civil leadership, why is she making the “I don’t vote for pastor in chief” argument? That’s not the Christian standard for civil leadership! I guess non-Christians have their own standards, but a religious leader of a religious group ought to hie to the religious standard he purports to believe or give up his position of leadership. Because he is the one who is supposed to be a pastor.
Sign up to like comment