 |  |  |
| 0:00 | -1:06:48 |
David and Sarah have another action packed pod. First, the US Solicitor General weighs in on whether the Court should hear the case about whether Harvard’s admission policy violates race discrimination laws. Then they talk about a case that was argued this week at the Court that looked at (once again) whether states could refuse to allow voucher money to go to religious schools. Then the 9th Circuit had some feisty dissenting opinions when it upheld California’s ban on high capacity magazines for guns. And lastly, should judges be able to pick their replacements?
Show Notes:
-Wall Street Journal: “Federal Courts Aren’t Royal Ones”
-New Yorker: “On “Succession,” Jeremy Strong Doesn’t Get the Joke”
I love AO and all but y'all can't act as the aggrieved victim here. You threw the first punch, you were smack talking the Remnant for a good week before Jonah responded. So you shouldn't be surprised that Jonah responded in kind, in what felt like a pretty dismissive of the whole affair kind of way. This feels like a college sports rivalry where one team is super fired up about the rivalry and the other doesn't even think there is one.
There's two very important factors in the Podcast Wars that need to be remembered.
1. The Remnant has always identified as a Pirate Skiff. By definition, it cannot fly the Dispatch flag in good faith.
2. David's resolute inability to properly pronounce the word GIF is an affront that demands rebuke in whatever form is available.